Dear DC Comics and Warner Brothers,
Allow me to begin my letter with a fact: You guys are missing the point.
What caused this random letter to be penned in the first place? My reading of Catwoman #0 and the constant “news” of your Justice League feature film endeavors. I’ll begin with Catwoman.
DC, I am one of your few female fans of the recently rebooted leather clad anti-hero after you bravely (some say stupidly) went where only fanfictions went. Selina was slowly becoming a character one could relate to, a vulnerable woman inside of a tough shell, and then Catwoman #0 happened. I don’t pretend to know what goes on in your offices, so I don’t know how much of that story was written when handed over to the all female creative team. I also don’t know who the hell told you the tentative cover art was wonderful enough to release to the public, or that the subsequent attempt at righting the wrongs was better.
Catwoman is an overtly sexual character. We know this. She is already in a body hugging leather suit so there is NO NEED for her to pose in a way that is not only physically impossible, but in a position that prominently displays her chest and ass. To be fair, you guys attempted to rectify these anatomical issues so the pose was more believable, but kept the idiotic pose. My question is why couldn’t she be leaning against a building without a care in the world? Was it such an outrageous idea that she pet a black cat, or held a jewel, or even whirled her whip overhead?
Ripped to shreds by the internet, several prominent artists rendered their own versions of the cover to the point where it got mass media coverage, most notably from Comics Alliance.
Kudos for listening to only part of the outrage, DC!
Again, to be fair, you guys tried to go one step further and allowed women to write the book, starting with the offending issue. As stated earlier, I have no idea how much of the story was written prior to this, and while a lot of the comic community cheered at this development, I felt alone in my disdain for it, for the writing was truly abysmal. I’ve never been invested in a character less and that says a lot, seeing as I read almost half of the DC52. I felt a sense of kinship with the writer of this tumblr post, who put their thoughts far more eloquently than I did here in this letter that will not come to your attention, for I am but a girl on the internet.
I get that the run is not on Brubaker’s level or some other creators, but just because you get a woman to write a female character does not automatically mean you’re going to have an improvement. Bad writing is bad writing, no matter what gender, race, politics, etc.
– Tumblr user comicbookwomen
Comics aside, I wearily turn my attention to the other offenders, to whom this letter is also addressed.
Warner Brothers…I honestly don’t know where to begin with you.
I understand COMPLETELY that you guys feel the need to compete with Marvel Studio and understand that the time is right to begin welcoming viewers into this wonderful universe with films that interconnect.
FOR THE LOVE OF GOD, DO NOT MAKE THESE MOVIES JUST FOR THE SAKE OF GIVING MARVEL COMPETITION.
I cannot stress how much we the fans (while, admittedly, more than half of which would see any movie put out by you guys) would love some quality in your films. There is so much story material out there, ripe for the adapting in which viewers (both fans and newcomers) could get on board with. Following Marvel’s lead is not a bad thing and if the internet rips you a new one for it, so what? It’ll quickly dissipate once you blow our mind holes with a flick leaving us begging for more. Nolan’s trilogy had its flaws, as did Green Lantern and Superman Returns. I wish I could say optimism was high for Man of Steel, but I ask…who the hell told you Henry Cavill can act well enough to be Superman? Did no one see The Immortals? Sure, he’s aesthetically pleasing, but that is not everything. I urge you all to choose directors who are fans of the source material, much as Jon Favreau was for the Iron Man series.
Aggressive Comix’s Geekgasm series echoed our feelings about impending movies as well.
Please, hear the cries of many and do not rush into starting a Justice League movie.
I don’t doubt for a second that another Batman story is in the works and you know what? I’ll even help you with that in my next article. I’m going to dream cast a new Batman movie and pick a story that could be wonderfully adapted and segued into a Justice League ensemble.
I feel better now that some of this is off my chest…I only hope that someone will bring you guys to your senses before fans become alienated further.
Sincerely,
Leia
stop being so butthurt. It’s only been a year since the whole reboot started. It took decades of changes, eras, and creators to make the characters they were before the reboot. Give them a break. Speak with your wallet. Write physical letters to these companies and go get some icecream and masturbate.
while ice cream and masturbatory sessions indeed sound like good fun, i must ask what you’re basing my “butthurt” feelings on. I constantly tell people to give the 52 a chance. i have so much hope and love for a lot of the titles currently going on and for someone to call me butthurt, i’m just left wonderfing wtf as i’m usually the one going: “just give them a chance!”
i have written letters (not just these open letter ones) and whenever i do speak with creators on behalf of ihogeek, these things are brought up.
your opinions are always welcome and as i see you’ve commented further, i’ll respond to those as well.
Well, we know he isn’t a butcher or a baker… XD
Look, there are things I’m not proud of, too. There are things in the new 52 I don’t like. They tried some things, some things didn’t work. Like Static Shock. That failed from the get go. From what I understand it’s some of the editors faults and the co-writers. But, like I said it’s only been a year. They have these wild ideas that they are trying to make work. Maybe Beast Boy is a bad idea. IDK. They could be working out a story to make him green again, or at least lovable. But maybe I’m an optimistic kind of guy. For me, the new 52 has been great. I’m generally a MARVEL, guy, with the exception to Batman and a few creators that DC has. The New 52 has led me to some great characters that I would not have cared of before hand. I tried reading Swamp thing, but it sucked [Alan Moore’s stuff.]. Reading books and stories before a certain time just takes so much out of me. The pacing is slow and the dialogue is wonky. And that’s just one example! Same goes for anything recent DC tried to do with Animal Man following Morrison’s run [which was great].
There are absolutely titles that were supreme disappointments from issue #1 (i’ll agree that static shock is one of them). a year, while not a lot of time, was enough for some stories to gather a decent following and to create story arcs of amazing potential (see Batman and Catwoman).
will i continue picking up catwoman, even if my faith in the creative team is considerably less than it was in winnick? absolutely!! i have hope.
However, the worst thing about the new 52 is the fact that Superman’s powered cells from sunlight parameters aren’t worked out. How the heck does Supergirl come out of cryogenic sleep for a years, just come to Earth and gets in the sun for all of 2days, and punch Superman, who has been on Earth soaking up the sun all of his life [25yrs…or something], across a continent? I can understand that he doesn’t want to hurt her, but he should be so much stronger than her. That’s fucked up DC, effed UP!
COMPLETELY AGREED.
i think the only thing i felt was just as much (i dont know…outrage?) at is stephanie brown’s lack of existence.
If you’ve read Supergirl 12, they explain it all. Her ship was orbiting around the sun for who knows how long. So she had more direct exposure in that short time than Kal’s 20 something years on Earth.
Good to know as Supergirl is one of the series I dropped five issues in!! Thanks :)
Catwoman hovers around the #50 spot on the charts. That is good. By comparison, around 2004, during the Brubaker run (you know, the run that everyone says is the best run ever?), it was in the mid 70s and making about 10,000 less. Prior to that, in summer of 2002, when Cooke was still on board, it was in the mid 60s, and doing about 7,000 less. This was when the economy was doing a whole lot better than it is now. So from a sales standpoint, doing what you want would actually mean LESS SALES FOR DC! So really, why should DC give a shit that the tiny bubble of Tumblr and various internet malcontents bitch about seeing Catwoman’s bra strap or the #0 pose? You get where I’m going with this? There are not enough people who share your opinion to affect sales POSITIVELY enough to make DC listen to you. Frankly, if DC had left the #0 cover exactly how it was, it wouldn’t have made any difference from a sales standpoint.
This isn’t to say that your opinion doesn’t have value or merit. It’s just that if DC listens to that opinion, they lose money. I think Gail Simone says it best on her blog…
http://gailsimone.tumblr.com/post/31527054582/i-cant-help-but-be-curious-surely-you-must-have-seen
I’d suggest everyone here read it and take it to heart.
Personally, I’d go with forgoing casting, and simply write the best Batman story you know how. They’re going to F up the casting, anyways, as they believe stars need to have the lead roles.
ah yes, but to write my own story would make it fanfiction :(
i am curious to know your thoughts on the batman casting though!