http://brittneywilliamsportfolio.carbonmade.com/
http://the-orange-one.deviantart.com/
http://anotherbrittneywilliams.tumblr.com/
See you all real soon!
Max Eber
Staff Writer/The Doctor
max@sub-cultured.com
Twitter: @maxlikescomics
First, most of people are aware by now of DC Comics’ big Batwoman debacle this week with its Eisner award winning writer/artist JH Williams III and co-writer W. Haden Blackman both deciding to leave after issue #26 and since said announcement their run is now being cut even shorter.
It has to be said outright; editorial driving away all of it’s A+ talent (and lesser talents but still talent nonetheless) over excessive editorial interference and last minute edicts and bans over the past two years has gotten ridiculous. Since the reboot over twenty artists and writers have burned bridges and left DC Comics due to poor treatment, last minute changes and editorial impeding storytelling. Writer Gail Simone was fired via email and is only back writing Batgirl (an abysmal book in tone and content, the worst writing of her career) because fans had a massive outcry. Add in Dan Didio and Co’s ongoing feud with Batgirl fans over nonsensical edicts barring former Batgirls Stephanie Brown and Cassandra Cain from canon (a blessing in disguise) and non-canon alternate universe books (seemingly purely out of spite), the decimated state of the Batman family of heroes, the Flash family (care for the Flash title which actually is a terrific book) and so on. So many issues all over the board it is hard to list them all. Above all; the entire DC canon since the reboot, instead of being simpler and easier to understand as intended or touted to being, is a complete and utter mess. Look no further than Superboy’s new time-travel laden origin for an example of the awful and unnecessarily complicated choices DC has made.
Yes they are a company and they aim to make money; but all this dirty laundry and negative press regarding how people are treated there in an industry meant to entertain is leaving overall a negative image of the company and discourages aspiring writers (like myself) and artists to want to work there.
Literally any other company in any other field whose problems concerning the higher ups and that much information being revealed at how difficult and negative everything is working with them, would be toast. Diane Nelson either has a complete laissez-faire attitude, is completely ignorant of her editorial staff and what happens when they open their mouths on twitter, Facebook and at conventions, or is just another loose screw in the entire system. Which is disappointing since we need more women Presidents of companies. However, just because she’s a woman does not mean she is doing a good job. Their inability to really grasp or launch a movie universe franchise, their slow dismantling of Vertigo, the lack of attention to girls as a consumer base, ignoring kids and tweens as consumers in general outside of toys and Lego and DC’s extreme fear of Wonder Woman are just a few problems that plague DC Entertainment outside of their comic line. The cracks are everywhere.
As for DC the editorial staff might as well write all their books themselves if they won’t let anyone tell the story the way they really want to and force so many last minute edicts and moves ultimately chasing everyone away from the sandbox. Many of these edicts appear purely out of spite; for instance at Baltimore Comic Con this past Saturday (the 7th) Dan Didio has just in response to the barring of Batwoman from being married additionally revealed Mera and Aquaman were never married either. Which if you read the newer comics there are many references to her being the Queen of Atlantis as Arthur is King so I don’t know what is going on there. If it is a joke, it’s a stupid low blow. If it’s true then I am left rather speechless.
The only thing consistent about DC Comics is that editorial hates marriages. And they hate marriages because it supposedly “ruins drama”. This is false; characters being married under good writers should never be an issue in keeping superhero narratives fun and exciting. You also don’t need their lives to be a constant drag. That’s not why I read superheroes, but perhaps I am not who they want reading their comics. It’s really not hard. To say otherwise means you are a poor writer or lack creativity.
This is where I shut down and thank the stars, stripes and Wonder Woman’s invisible jet that DC fans are better at handling DC’s characters than their own company. Because where in the reality of DC Comics is negative and grim and full of just awful over in fan-made works there is nothing but mostly love and overall, understanding of the characters.
This is where I happily bring to you Brittney Williams’ concept ‘The Daily Planet Files’ and it is the Superman adaptation you never knew you even wanted.
Fan-work like Brittney Williams has’ The Daily Planet Files’ Superman concept and upcoming one-shot “manga-esque” comic is literally lifeblood for me in its brilliance. For those jaded and sad by all the negativity from DC and miss Superman that is a 100% accurate and true to form. This is Superman done right.
A personal fan project for the character designer and recent story trainee at Walt Disney Animation Studios, Brittney is doing this for herself and it just so happens to be absolutely a pitch perfect rendition of Superman, Lois Lane, Jimmy Olsen and all their colleagues at The Daily Planet. Take a look for yourself:
And that’s just a taste. A word about the series from Brittney’s deviantart (where you can see super HQ big versions of these images) regarding her Superman concepts and the project:
It all began as I was nonchalantly channel surfing one day in early April, and I happened upon Superman the Animated series. Immediately I was thrown back into the early 90’s when I was a kid, and afternoons were spent playing outside then running into the house at 3 to watch Superman. I started to remember how much I actually used to love Superman and I was suddenly inspired to draw.
As some of you may have noticed Lois, Jimmy, and Clark vary a bit with each drawing in my gallery. That phenomenon is due to me never being quite satisfied with their designs. In each drawing I play with different influences, shapes, and styles, but at the same time, I try to stay true to the characters and how I would want to draw them as an artist.
It is actually really cool to see the progression she mentions if you look through her gallery; Clark goes from being super broad and vertical to being a bit more gentle, burly and having a bit of a slouch. The oafish “country boy”. They all get slightly cartoonier and manga-esque. Jimmy is the most obvious in progression if you look through her archive; he goes from chipmunk-y buck toothed duck haired Jimmy to a scruffy hipster with a sparse mustache to then a scrappy greaser-type with a patchy goatee and in another display of art evolution recent pictures feature him a bit more clean shaven and the return of the bowtie to his punkier style. It’s really really cool and it’s amazing how well Brittney gets these characters and yet it be fresh and new.
More from Brittney:
Eventually a story idea began forming in my head. I wanted to draw a little comic, purely for my personal entertainment, but alas the Internet is a dangerous thing. This is where The Daily Planet Files comes into existence. Just a short story about Clark Kent being the protector of the city he loves, and how I perceive the world his family and friends live in, my interpretation. Being one a little too obsessed with manga/anime I instantly knew it would be drawn in my strange shonen inspired style. I’ve always loved Osamu Tezuka, Akira Toriyama, Go Nagai- but yet I digress.
She has posted teasers of pages from the one-shot on her tumblr and I urge everyone to go check it out; some are much too big to put on here it just doesn’t serve them any justice.
In some ways it is disappointing that people like Brittney are not actually in charge or put at the helm of a project or could take her project to DC and it actually become a huge money-making franchise. The want I have for this as an ongoing or a graphic novel series or an animated TV-show (or all of the above) of this is just massive. And it would be popular. Just look at it. You know it would be!
I wish DC would wise-up. Because at the end of the day I love their characters but hate the company. If I had to choose, these days I will always go towards fan-media full of love and admiration for the characters than their own official stories and media dictated by a stale and bitter editorial who are overall stuck in an unfortunate state of absolute disconnect and poor taste.
http://brittneywilliamsportfolio.carbonmade.com/
http://the-orange-one.deviantart.com/
http://anotherbrittneywilliams.tumblr.com/
See you next time!
Max Eber
Staff Writer/The Doctor
max@ihogeek.com
Twitter: @maxlikescomics
It’s a bird! It’s a plane! No, it’s a successful Superman movie! Aside from arguing the merits of the movie itself Man of Steel has broken June movie records. What does that mean? It means that the sequel has already been green lit and a Justice League movie is that much closer to becoming a reality. But you don’t want to hear about all of that. You came here to read about Man of Steel.
I’m going to be honest, I went into Man of Steel with almost zero expectations, after the semi disappointment that was Superman Returns and the debacle that was Green Lantern (Which I don’t blame on Ryan Reynolds, but that is subject that is best discussed in another article.) I was more than a little soured on the whole prospect of DC Films. I don’t count Chris Nolan’s Batman movies as a part of the DC movie universe because that Batman couldn’t exist with Superheroes like Green Lantern and Superman, so I’m not going to count those films.
Man of Steel is the first DC Comics film in my opinion that has successfully brought a character like Superman into the pop culture consciousness. Now don’t get me wrong we all know Superman, but most people think of the character as out of date or with morals that are too lofty to be relatable. In Man of Steel, I think we see for the first time a Superman that still holds on to those choices and morals but is fully realized. An extraordinary being dealing with his own need to be human, it deals with the need to be a part of the human condition but not being able to be understood by humanity. In my opinion each of the Superman movies has been a reflection of the national mentality at the time of creation. So while the main criticism for Man of Steel seems to be it is too “dark” or “realistic” I would argue that the word being looked for is modern. It is a retelling of the Superman mythos that while paying homage to past films and comic history does not follow it religiously, which I think is a good thing.
Part of the reason I was able to buy into this movie so well is due to Henry Cavill’s great performance as the Man of Steel himself. He was at times stoic, playful, sarcastic, and played the quiet strength of Superman well. Here is an important thing to note though, this is a Superman movie, not a Clark Kent movie. Just like Iron Man 3 was more accurately Tony Stark 3 or Kiss Kiss Bang Bang 2, Man of Steel chose to focus on Clark/Kal’El as Superman. While there were many great moments with Diane Lane and Cavill, the true strength of the character in this film was focused on Superman. I am hoping in the sequel which we all know is coming that we will see Cavill get to play Clark Kent a little more often since his turn in shows like the Tudors have shown his ability to play both comedy and drama.
But let’s get to my favorite part Amy Adams as Lois Lane. I’m going to fanboy for a moment here, I was so excited when she was announced. Amy Adams is one of my favorite actresses and I think she played Lois to a “t”, not the Lois that we have gotten recently in even the pre-New 52 comics but a Lois Lane that holds her own, she suits up, she kicks ass, and she is a great investigative journalist. These are all the things that she should be and is. I can’t wait to see more of her character in the sequel.
And last but not least here are the caveats, the problems, the shortfalls, and missteps that I felt existed in the movie. While I understand the narrative choices of the flashbacks I felt like some of them were misplaced or entirely unnecessary within the confines of the “Superman” story the movie was trying to tell. Laurence Fishburne felt underused as Perry White, and character development in general fell short. Also, while I enjoyed Michael Shannon as Zod, I missed Terence Stamp, The “Kneel before Zod” line was so iconic I couldn’t help but miss it a little bit.
Overall I loved the movie, it helped that I went in thinking two things “Expect nothing” and thanks to my fellow staff writer Tushar, “Infinite Worlds in the DC universe”. This movie exceeded my expectations, helped me fall in love with Superman again, and gave me hope for a fully realized DC movie universe.
What did you think? Let me know in the comments, or on Facebook, or Twitter.
UPDATE: It was recently pointed out to me that I mistakenly identified the Actress Diane Lane as Diane Keaton, probably because my mind was somewhere up in the clouds while writing this article.
Samuel Smith
Staff Writer
samuel@ihogeek.com
@samwasbornanerd
Erica Durance, the actress who played Lois Lane on CW’s hit series Smallville, has an upcoming guest appearance on an episode of David E. Kelley’s Harry’s Law. Erica will shimmy into a familiar pair of tights for Harry’s Law, as she plays a mentally unstable person who believes she is Wonder Woman.
Although no stranger to the Wonder Woman persona, having donned a similar Amazonian Princess wardrobe for an episode while playing Lois Lane, this particular costume is actually the infamous “new pants” costume from David E. Kelly’s giant fail Wonder Woman pilot. The outfit was originally worn by Adrianne Palicki and was cause for a lot of controversy over the look, which was followed by alterations that were a little better received.
In a recent interview with TV Guide, Erica talks about how it felt to step into those iconic tights so soon after the controversy.
How does it feel actually getting to play Wonder Woman… of sorts?
Erica Durance: “Of sorts” is the best way to put it and it’s probably the best way to play it because you get to have a little bit of freedom and you’re not judged quite so harshly. The way that I was able to work with the character Wonder Woman in this is through the eyes of a woman who desperately needed a strong female archetype to look up to, and she had gone through such terrible things and this was her alter ego. I would challenge anybody who said that she didn’t think she was Wonder Woman. This is how she found her way out.So, as an actress, getting to put on the suit and play Wonder Woman was fantastic and then I got this whole other layer because of the way David E. Kelley had written it, to ground it in this kind of humanistic viewpoint, which was lovely.
Usually I’m the guy who is very picky about my heroes. For example, I hated seeing Ryan Reynolds play Deadpool, Green Lantern and Hannibal King, even though I find him a fantastic actor. In my personal opinion, Erica pulls off the costume so much better than Adrianne Palicki. Just off of the images of Erica alone, I find myself totally buying it. I could see her as Wonder Woman just as we saw her make a great Lois Lane. Those are just my thoughts on it, what are yours?
Erica Durance’s episode of Harry’s Law airs Wednesday, Jan. 11 at 9/8c on NBC.
By now, if you’re a Smallville fan, you’ve probably heard through the grapevine or www.bleedingcool.com that Bryan Q. Miller was tapped for writing season eleven of Smallville in novel format. I seriously feel like I was the last to know about this, but that aside, if it turns out to be true, it would be a very good thing for fans of the show.