Halloween is fast approaching (says the writer who has yet to start making his 1930’s Flash Gordon hot-pants costume) and to celebrate I’ve found a wacky bunch of informative and even a little spooky and all-together amazing books to share with everyone from Applewood Books, who specialize in new reprints of classics from yesteryear. These books are historical, odd, and are still helpful and fun even today. Parents, do you want you and your kids to step away from the TV, tablets and laptops for a little while? Many of these books are chock full of fun and interesting activities and things to do this fall and onwards into the future that will help unplug and interact. Don’t have kids? These books are still great to have and are great references especially if you babysit. Or actually like to have fun. It’s always good to have a party trick. Which leads me to my first pick:
Madam Le Marchand’s Fortune Teller and Dreamer’s Dictionary.
In the spirit of Halloween there is first this fun “occult” gem and guide originally all the way back from 1863. This eerie guidebook to fortune telling provides an endless list of how to tell people’s, especially ladies, fortunes in various ways from rolling dice to tea leaves, palm reading, cards, counting people’s freckles or moles or egg whites, being able to calculate a person’s character and discovering truth from falsehoods. It also includes a nifty pre-Freud “Dreamer’s Dictionary” a glossary of dream symbols and their meanings to one’s future or current state , lists of fortunate and unfortunate days and even particular charms to enact. With this little tome kids at parties or get-togethers can recreate the fervid Victorian interest in the supernatural, read each others or adult’s fortunes and one can liven up any Halloween or Birthday (or even Christmas if you prefer the British tradition of horror and ghost stories) party with a real life Harry Potter Divination “lesson” or exhibition. It’s still fun stuff to do and weird people out. Speaking of finding things to do…there is then my second pick, which is actually two:
The Boys and Girls Own Books
Continuing the guidebooks filled with fun activities to do there are also two books hailing from 1829 and 1834 respectively that can fast become a great source of entertainment; The Boy’s Own Book by William Clarke, and The Girl’s Own Book by Mrs. Maria Child. Written long before the advent of electricity, radio, television, internet and videogames these books are stuffed to the brim with fun games and guides of activities kids can enjoy and play the same way they did two-hundred years ago. It’s not only fun to see what kids back then did, it’s just as much fun to revive them. Many of the games are still played today so many are still quite accessible.
The Boy’s Book is filled with rough and tumble gymnastic games and exercises and chemistry-based experiments and activities that would make most modern helicopter parents faint (yay mercury!), but there are also guides to other ball-based games and small “sports” games ranging from marbles to spinning tops. There are guides on swimming, learning sign language, archery, draughts and checkers, “ledgerdemain” or slight-of-hand and magic tricks, card-games and many other fun miscellaneous activities. One interesting one in particular is how to preserve rose-buds in early summer to bloom at Christmastime (this was before repeating roses were common and the planted varieties at the time only bloomed in late spring), arithmetic games and puzzles, riddles and guide to fishing, fencing and pigeon care. There is literally nothing left out in this little book and while a bunch of entries are purely comical or rather impossible to do now and serve more as a learning experience and a laugh, boys and girls both can still find fun and interesting things to do or learn how to do from this book. It’s super useful for those who watch kids, are a camp counselor or just want to be the “cool” cousin or sibling.
Likewise The Girl’s Own Book is chock full of games in which to play, and while somewhat dated in terms of the scope of what girls could do is still surprisingly engaging; girls didn’t just sit and play with their dolls in fact many of the games suggested in this book are still played today on playgrounds (if kids are even granted recess) by both sexes. The activities in this book are more group based; circle based both word and action games to do with friends most involving a little bit of roleplay. Some games like “Cries of Paris” involve a lot of roleplay, each child assigned to be a certain pedlar (cherries, umbrellas, water-bearer, flowergirl etc) which also involves the use of french phrases. Perhaps a helpful exercise and game for French teachers to try out. The Girl’s Own Book also features guides to archery, riddles and puzzles, tongue teasers and songs, active games like shuttlecock (similar to badminton), old out of fashion or rather forgotten games like the more or less exclusively female game la grace (small hoop throwing and catching back and forth on two rods) and even a guide to calisthenics. Additionally the Girl’s book is much more creative activity based, providing different things in which to actually “make” with one’s hands such as paper screens, many different types of baskets, paper cutting and folding, candle ornaments, engraving egg shells, butterfly and leaf impressions, and then domestic topics with guides to sewing and knitting and even encyclopedia-esque guides to bees and silkworms, on keeping animals and also gardening. While a bit less full to the brim with activities as The Boy’s Own Book it still is a extremely cool book full of activities to try instead of the usual offers. I’d gift both books together as a bundle for both girls and boys to get a complete scope of fun stuff to do or as a gift for teachers and babysitters.
Onwards to my third pick!
Goops and How to Be Them: A Manual of manners for Polite Infants by Gelett Burgess
This 1900 book is a guide on manners full of small little poems and poem-y stories to teach etiquette and proper outstanding morals in children. It’s notable for its very stylized and simple illustrations featuring the titular ” Goops”, children who are depicted as these bald round headed little caricatures with noodley almost octopus like arms and simple but very expressive faces including quite a bit of side-eye. Many of the little ditties featuring these Goops as they both behave and misbehave are actually still pretty applicable to kids today, but the real charm lies in the artwork, whose simplicity and quirkiness looks like something someone today would come up with, not 113 years ago. The poems and little stories are charming in their own way and while somewhat dated the book can still be enjoyed for the illustrations alone which are quite different from most children’s book art of the time which leads us to my final pick….
Freaks and Frolics of Little Girls and Boys by Josephine Pollard
If this book title doesn’t belong in an October review then someone help me. This lushly illustrated book of poems and little ditties about mischievous, overtly emotional or just naughty children in the era of being seen but overall not to be heard or fuss is different from the above book in that it is more conventional in it’s “playing it straight” Victorian earnestness…but…. there’s something amiss and extremely compelling amongst its gorgeous color prints. While a great deal of the entries are straightforward tales about little girls such as “Foolish Fanny”, and “Stupid Jane” (things that don’t age too well) and boys like “Teasing Tom” and “Inky Jake” all of whom express “too much” of a certain emotion, or are vain, or get ink everywhere, essentially examples of what not to be…there….seems also seems to be….oh….a poem-story about a kid catching on fire as a warning not to play with fire. Okay. Let’s see…oh god she’s getting attacked by winged pies….and oh god a boy makes himself into a kite….another boy getting attacked by poultry and other farm animals in his dream…..oh….oh my. He actually gets dipped into a vat of ink? Oh god. This is some weird stuff. Help. Help.
Amidst the earnestness and some rather dated and “cutesy” stories there are somewhat macabre or fanciful additions to teach those kids who are seen as less than good or well behaved a “lesson” that truly put the “freaks” in the book. These are further emphasized or rather contrasted by the very pretty, conventionally detailed and idealized artwork of the time which is a treat to look at especially for those interested in what I’ll assume is mostly middle and upper-class fashion and activities of the time for children. The array of socks, bows, stockings and shoes and jackets the little boys wear is just as interesting to look at as the girl’s smock dresses maybe even more so as the boys fashions are no longer really worn whilst variations of some of the girls’ dresses are still used and worn by little girls even today. Much of the behavior seen in the book would not be seen as freakish today either but more reflects what was seen as bothersome to Victorian sensibilities so it’s further a curious read to see how things have changed and realize how things have changed since then too. Yet another book that is great for checking out for the illustrations, fashion, and bizarre stories alone.
So if you can, take a look into the past this week and pick up one of these books or seek them out to have or give to others as they’d make a perfect gift for the right kid or person. You might learn something frighteningly good if you do!
See you next week!
Max Eber
Staff Writer/The Doctor
max@sub-cultured.com
Twitter: @maxlikescomics
Let’s be honest: DC Comics doesn’t know what to do with the Captain Marvel/Shazam family franchise despite them sitting on a potential goldmine. “Not….Batman? Don’t….know how it….works? Lighthearted…how does this….what is this?” Captain Marvel, Mary Marvel and Captain Marvel Jr. have been kicked around, depowered, repowered, and depowered again; they have been completely violated, and pulled through the ringer so many times by DC scribes in the past decade just because of their more wholesome nature, which has made it pretty dismal to be a fan. It is also such a far cry from their status as the most popular and widely read superhero “family” of the 1940’s, outselling (yes) even Superman and Batman at the time. Billy Batson’s debut in 1940 in Whiz Comics #2 sold over 500,000 copies.
Hey DC, how much are your top books selling a month now? A little over 1/5 of that. Yeah. Even Mary Marvel headlined Wow Comics, and by 1945 had her own Mary Marvel ongoing book as well. Let me say that again: She had her own ongoing. That lasted from 1945 to 1948. How difficult is it today for a female character to get their own solo these days? How much applause occurs when it actually does happen? Something is wrong here.
So DC, here’s my plea: Stop trying to fit the Shazam family into comics. They’re not going to thrive, as they haven’t in over 40 years. But don’t give up on them completely; why not give them a try in other media? Just listen.
The proposal:
Warner Bros and DC Comics should take a chance on a Captain Marvel/Shazam family cartoon series aimed at younger kids perhaps in the 10-14 range (and beyond, here’s looking at you Tumblr). They could, if they did it right, have a goldmine for merchandise and an opportunity for a really fun, energetic show for all ages that both boys and girls could equally enjoy.
Stylistically I envision a bright and colorful, pastel-toned and soft Max Fleischer Superman animation styling with that 1930’s-40’s esque setting that evokes the slapstick animated comedy shorts both from MGM and Warner Bros. Studios from the same era. Keep the tone light, quick, and snappy. Have story lines that mirror old adventure pulp movies and mysteries. With the Shazam franchise seeped deep with ancient mythology, archeology, and the supernatural, it seems like a no brainer! If The Mummy could spin out a relatively successful cartoon series, so could Shazam. Plus, archeology. Just archeology.
Alternatively, they could work with an Asian animation company to do a magical girl and super sentai meets western superhero style show like the oncoming joint French-Japanese production Miraculous Ladybug set to air next fall, or go on an adaptation “inspired by” limb and do a giant-robo style series. Yes, a Captain Marvel/Shazam giant-robo show. Ever since I saw artist Cliff Chang’s designs for a vintage anime style “Justice League” featuring a Gatchaman Batman and a Superman that is a little boy who controls a giant robot, I knew that robot concept would fit Shazam better. And it would fit Billy Batson better, too, as he truly is the child within the body of a near invulnerable adult man once transformed. Can you imagine how cool that would be? Summoned through an ancient artifact that activated due to Billy’s pure heart, Shazam, centuries old golem-robot rises from his slumber when summoned to protect Fawcett City against Dr. Sivana, and his ancient counterpart, Black Adam! Mechas for everyone!
Worried about two good natured young twins Billy and Mary being uninteresting as leads though? Let me point you to the enormous popularity of Gravity Falls.
Why is this so important? Why do I want this so badly? Because I really cannot think of anything else in Warner Bros./DC arsenal that’s “different” from the usual Batman or Superman shtick that could be appealing to kids. Shazam has always been such a happy medium between “superhero” sci-fi wackiness and then magical fantasy fiction it really does seem a no brainer for a cartoon series. The presence of magic along with sci-fi elements mean lots of variety, something you can seldom get with more sci-fi based superheroes.
My other reasoning? Mary Marvel.
I don’t understand the hate or dislike Mary Marvel seems to get from some comic fans. Is it because she’s actually a young girl? Is it because she is super feminine, often bubbly and sweet? She’s often called or pegged as the Snow White (she literally has Disney-brand animal magnetism, one of my favorite skill sets ever because animals are the best and hey I love Snow White) or the Pollyanna of DC comic heroines.
Sure she can be written as pretty naïve or as a general ingénue (sometimes a bit too much) but I think it’s such a cool inversion because she is literally one of the most powerful superheroes of any gender in DC Comics according to skill set. But she hasn’t been treated as such in a long time. She has such an interesting history and legacy as a female character. I think she’s a great example to girls to show that they can be a tomboy and kick ass, or they can be feminine and also kick ass. Too often media seems to pit one against the other, and that just shouldn’t be.
The Shazam/Marvel family get little of the respect they should be getting. This is why I think the best plan would be to give them a place where they could really shine; not in the comics, but on a cartoon show on TV. I feel that’s where their true potential could be explored much easier than trying a monthly comic. They can be retooled to be fresh and new as long as the humor and lighthearted appeal remains. So dear DC Comics, please hear my plea for The Big Red Cheese,the much maligned Mary, and poor Captain Marvel Jr. Give them a chance and invest in trying an animated TV series. I’ll even write it myself if need be. I’ll write a proposal. Anything. Just give them a chance to actually succeed.